Europe / Commercial & demonstration

Tetrino – Kola Pennisula

Organizations, planners, suppliers, equipment, controls, and reported system specifications—with source-level citations.

CoveragePartial public record
Named organizations3
System facts3
Sources reviewed3
Last researched2026-07-19

Tetrino was one of three remote Murmansk-region villages included in a wind-solar-diesel modernization program. Public reporting identifies the municipal contracting authority and contractor, but does not provide a complete Tetrino-specific bill of materials.

Research status
Commissioned in 2015; later public reporting documented wind-equipment reliability problems
Historical classification
Remote
Reported capacity
See component specifications
Coordinates
66.06033, 38.24522
Evidence note: “Every company” cannot be proven from public material alone. This page lists every organization found in the recovered record and reviewed sources, preserves unknown roles, and explicitly marks undisclosed controller or equipment details.

Project delivery

Who was involved in Tetrino – Kola Pennisula?

3 publicly identified organizations. Where a recovered source named a participant without explaining its work, the role remains explicitly unspecified.

Organization

Murmansk regional government

Regional program sponsor and funder [2]

Organization

President-Neva Energy Center

Design and equipment contractor for Tetrino, Chavanga, and Chapoma [3]

Organization

Varzuga rural settlement administration

Municipal contracting authority [3]

System evidence

Reported capacity and specifications

Values can describe different project phases or components. Source citations are attached to each figure so discrepancies remain visible.

Three-village program demand
515 kW across Tetrino, Chavanga, and Chapoma [2]
Three-village renewable allocation
175 kW wind and solar; approximately 34% of program demand [2]
Generation architecture
Wind, solar PV, and diesel generation [2][3]

Controls and hardware

Equipment and controller details

Manufacturer and model are shown only when a source names them. Generic descriptions are not converted into guessed product assignments.

No controller or equipment model was found in the reviewed public sources. This is a disclosure gap, not evidence that the project lacks coordinated controls.

Provenance

3 sources

Primary owner, government, university, supplier, and engineering sources are preferred. Archived references preserve claims whose original pages moved or disappeared.

  1. [1]
    Recovered Microgrid Projects record

    Internet Archive · Archived source · captured 2020-07-06

  2. [2]
    Renewables to Power Up Remote Russian Villages

    UN Climate Change · Secondary research

  3. [3]