Organizations, planners, suppliers, equipment, controls, and reported system specifications—with source-level citations.
CoveragePartial public record
Named organizations2
System facts3
Sources reviewed3
Last researched2026-07-19
The recovered directory labels this a 100 kW KPCL microgrid in Mandya, but the exact installation could not be matched to a public technical file. Official records separately verify KPCL's larger Belakavadi solar project and BHEL's EPC role; those figures are shown as context, not silently merged with the archived 100 kW record.
Research status
Historical record with unresolved facility identity
Historical classification
Community
Reported capacity
See component specifications
Coordinates
15.31728, 75.71389
Evidence note: “Every company” cannot be proven from public material alone. This page lists every organization found in the recovered record and reviewed sources, preserves unknown roles, and explicitly marks undisclosed controller or equipment details.
Who was involved in KPCL Mandya Karnataka Microgrid?
2 publicly identified organizations. Where a recovered source named a participant without explaining its work, the role remains explicitly unspecified.
Organization
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL)
Turnkey EPC for KPCL's separately verified Belakavadi plant; relationship to the archived 100 kW record is unconfirmed [3]
Organization
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL)
Owner named by the recovered project title; owner of the separately verified Belakavadi solar plant [1][2]
System evidence
Reported capacity and specifications
Values can describe different project phases or components. Source citations are attached to each figure so discrepancies remain visible.
100 kW; exact site and equipment not disclosed [1]
Separately verified KPCL Belakavadi plant
5 MW crystalline-silicon PV; not assumed to be the same asset [2][3]
Controls and hardware
Equipment and controller details
Manufacturer and model are shown only when a source names them. Generic descriptions are not converted into guessed product assignments.
No controller or equipment model was found in the reviewed public sources. This is a disclosure gap, not evidence that the project lacks coordinated controls.
Provenance
3 sources
Primary owner, government, university, supplier, and engineering sources are preferred. Archived references preserve claims whose original pages moved or disappeared.